![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
scribblinlenoreSo last night chatting with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
pun and rhiannonhero, we were discussing how this episode really screams "gay!" And how both Ma and Pa Kent seemed terrified that they're going to end up with a gay alien son and are willing to compromise almost any value to see that he doesn't.And then all these parallels started coming to mind, and I started thinking: This could totally be a story about homosexuality in our society.
Lex and Clark are both different from other people, not normal, "freaks" as Lex puts it in "Extinction." (Read, gay)
Lex carries his difference openly. Clark hides his, out of fear. He can blend in, seem normal, even if that's a lie that ties him in knots. (In the closet)
Lex and Clark instinctively recognize themselves in each other. They have a bond, a "destiny." (They're in love!) Yet, Clark can't bring himself to admit his difference to Lex, even though Lex already knows, even though Clark knows he knows. Clark wants the relationship, but the fact that he can't own up to who he really is gets in the way.
Lex gets sent to Belle Reeve for insisting on the truth, for trying to bring family skeletons out into the plain light of day, for not being the same kind of man his father is (heterosexual). He, in effect, gets forced back into the closet.
Belle Reeve is a state institution, a metaphor for society's rules and what happens to people who openly violate them. The inmates, other freaks, are "treated" until they learn to conform.
Clark's dilemma about whether to go to Lex's rescue is a conflict about whether to expose his true identity. Is it more important to keep his secret and be safe? Or to be authentic?
Everyone in Clark's life, except Lex, pressures him to keep his secret.
His father: Lex is different. (Because he's gay!)
His mother: You have another friend in the hospital. (And she's a girl!)
Pete: Lex can't be trusted. (Because he's gay!)
Chloe too, although I can't remember exactly what she said.
They all see Lex as a threat because he wants Clark to be honest about who he really is. Because he just wants Clark, period.
When the drug therapy fails to "cure" Lex, his father (patriarchy) insists on more cruel, more violating "treatment." Because no matter what the psychic or physical costs, Lex must be brought under control. (Turned straight)
Eventually, Clark just can't pretend anymore. The pressure is too much. He has to be true to his nature. He goes to Belle Reeve to liberate Lex from the closet and finally, openly shows Lex who he is. Lex is touched, awed, approving, and Clark experiences profound joy (the expression on his face when he's using his powers in front of Lex!) that he can finally show this person who is so important to him his truth. In this one moment, they are both free and united. (And so in love!)
After the rescue fails, Lex is sacrificed by his father, who tells him all the while that it's for his own good. (Like therapists who think they can turn gay men straight) Lex's dangerous honesty, his spark of individuality is erased along with his memory (at least seemingly), and in the end, he's parroting the party line. "My father just wants what's best for me." (To be like him, to be straight, no matter what the cost.)
Clark's parents refuse to acknowledge the horror of what's happened. They're just relieved that Clark's secret is safe. He's back to lying about who he is, and they can finally be comfortable again. The fact that a young man was tortured by his own father to achieve this state of affairs is less appalling than it might be in other circumstances. (Because Lex is gay and in danger of "turning" their son gay, and that somehow makes it a lesser crime.)
Clark is left with overwhelming guilt, not just because he failed, but because he feels both relief and disappointment that he can hide once more.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 09:41 am (UTC)And sadness, because he has lost his one chance to be what he is, and to share himself with someone. *sniffle*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:47 am (UTC)*puts head down on desk and cries*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 09:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 09:46 am (UTC)I can totally buy your arguement.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:49 am (UTC)I am hoping the next few episodes will be less emotionally upheaving, and I can go back to my usual reaction of: Clark shiny. Me like. Lex sexy. Me want.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 09:54 am (UTC)It makes your analysis that much creepier and spot-on when you remember (as I'm sure you already know) that both therapy, drugs, and intense electroshock have actually been used in the past as supposed ways to cure homosexuality.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:58 am (UTC)Half-naked farmboys tied up? I'm there!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:10 am (UTC)What they said.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:23 am (UTC)it's almost enough to make me still like smallville... but since i don't think it's deliberate? not quite enough. sigh.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:01 am (UTC)Still, it does make me feel a little better to concentrate on the gayness.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:26 am (UTC)I have some difficulty buying the rest of your theory because of the Luthorcest factor: Lionel did not act the straightest of all straight patriarchs in this ep. *shudder*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:48 am (UTC)This is my favorite read of the ep so far, not just because it feeds my slashy obsession, but because it's logical. Someone above said they didn't think the ep was intentionally written this way, but of AlandMiles, isn't Miles gay? And wasn't part of the original buzz about this show that it had gay overtones? I swear the producers DO let at least a couple of eps get through every year that purposely read gay to those who know how to break the code.
I want to believe.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:44 am (UTC)I was very uncomfortable with Martha last night and this really explains to me why I was so uncomfortable with her behavior and attitude.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:59 am (UTC)I'm not really well versed in Foucault's work but what you mentioned about modern society and the exercise of power through diagnosis and treatment? That's exactly what this episode is about. It was painful to watch, but utterly riveting.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:13 am (UTC)This episode was just cruel.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 12:02 pm (UTC)Only not in this case. *sniffle*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 12:05 pm (UTC)*g*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 07:04 pm (UTC)pimpage
Date: 2004-01-15 12:49 pm (UTC)Re: pimpage
Date: 2004-01-18 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 07:05 pm (UTC)Although, okay, maybe I already do. *g*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-23 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 10:23 pm (UTC)I'd add to this that when Clark keeps his powers a secret, the Kents, especially Jonathan, have a lot of power over him. If he were to do something that they disagreed with, he'd have no one else to turn to. Really, Clark's secret is the only power they hold over him, aside from emotional attachment. They can't ground him or force him to do anything. If he also had emotional support from Lex, who could also protect him, perhaps better than the Kents, then they would lose power over Clark and by proxy his abilities. Jonathan, moreso than Martha, is too dogmatically moral for me to believe he doesn't get off a little on controlling a strength like Clark's with his own moral sense.
-Silverkyst
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 11:40 pm (UTC)-Silverkyst
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 06:56 am (UTC)sandram
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 07:09 pm (UTC)yes, yes, yes.
Date: 2004-01-18 02:49 pm (UTC)Re: yes, yes, yes.
Date: 2004-01-18 07:10 pm (UTC)Poor Lex and Clark! The world just won't let them be in love.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 03:45 pm (UTC)I'm glad you thought this made sense!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-27 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-31 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: